CURRENT
 


Extensive Preparation and Planning Leads to Successful Negotiations; DGA National Board Unanimously Recommends Ratification of New Contract
DGA National Executive Director Jay D. Roth, Negotiating Committee Chairman Gil Cates and AMPTP President Nick Counter upon reaching tentative agreement.
click photo for larger view
On December 12, 2001, the DGA successfully concluded contract negotiations with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP). Formal negotiations had begun on November 26.

"We were able to achieve this successful new agreement under difficult circumstances because we were extraordinarily well-prepared," DGA Negotiating Committee Chairman Gil Cates said. "It is a tribute to the farsighted leadership of the Guild that we could negotiate this agreement in two weeks, something that would have been impossible had we not begun our internal preparations as far in advance as we did."

In early September 2001, the AMPTP sent a letter to DGA President Jack Shea and National Executive Director Jay D. Roth indicating a desire to quickly initiate and conclude negotiations for the new DGA Basic Agreement (BA) and Freelance Live and Tape Television Agreement (FLTTA). On September 29 the DGA's National Board voted to authorize the DGA leadership to hold exploratory meetings with the AMPTP and networks to determine whether early contract negotiations were possible. An unprecedented meeting with many of the industry's top executives was then held at the DGA on November 2. At that meeting, both the DGA leadership and the AMPTP signaled the desire to avoid production slowdowns and economic uncertainty — but the DGA also emphasized that early talks would not and could not result in an agreement that fell short of successfully addressing the key concerns of its members.

"You don't start negotiations without knowing what it is you want to accomplish," Roth explained. "You go in with proposals, some of which are musts, some of which are maybes, and some of which are reaches, but you never go in without a clear set of goals. Then, if you accomplish what you set out to do, you've made a good deal. Whether you make it seven months before your contract expires or on the eve of a strike, ultimately it doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is the deal you've made."

"It was truly remarkable to see the cohesion on the part of our Negotiating Committee," Cates added. "We had members from every category, members who flew in from New York and spent two weeks with us, members who cared as much about the future of the Guild as they did their own issues. We also had the scores of members who worked on the Contract Restructuring Committee, the Bi-council Committee, and all the other various Guild councils and committees. These devoted members spent many, many hours of their lives over the past several years to ensure that we were incredibly well-prepared for these negotiations, and the remarkable deal we were able to reach is a tribute to all of them."

From left: Director Steven Soderbergh, DGA President Jack Shea, DGA First Vice President and Creative Rights Co-chair Martha Coolidge, directors Garry Marshall, Todd Holland and Penelope Spheeris at an early DGA negotiations meeting. (Photo: Ryan Miller/Capture Imaging).
click photo for larger view
There are many highlights of the new contract, but one of the most important elements is an historic Interim Settlement Agreement that adapts existing agreements to the new technologies that are modernizing the way TV productions are shot. This "blended contract" agreement will cover all prime-time dramatic programming regardless of whether it is shot on film, traditional videotape or digital video.

The decision to explore early negotiations was based in part on the AMPTP's commitment to seriously consider the blended contract issues. "We actually presented our blended contract proposal to the AMPTP in June," said Roth. "By doing so, we in effect gave the producers six months to study the proposal before the beginning of formal negotiations. This, in turn, went a long way toward enabling us to conclude negotiations in an expedited manner."

The Guild leadership had recognized for more than a decade that this type of agreement was eventually going to be necessary, and began paving the way toward a blended contract well in advance of this negotiations. For the last several negotiations, the Guild had narrowed the gaps in compensation between the BA and FLTTA both for directors and stage managers. One of the biggest steps was taken in the 1999 negotiations, when the Guild resolved some fundamental issues in connection with its representation of Unit Production Managers (UPM) on multi-camera film shows, and a Qualifications List was set up for multi-camera UPMs.

As soon as the 1999 negotiations were completed, the Guild's leadership and staff began working in earnest toward establishing the framework

of a blended contract. A Contract Restructuring Committee was set up, chaired by John Rich. This Committee then referred the important below-the-line issues to a 21-member Bi-council Committee comprised of AD/UPMs and AD/SMs. The leadership of this Committee was initially set up to rotate among the category representatives, with 1AD/UPM Bob Lewis and Associate Director Barbara Roche assuming leadership in the final months. This Committee met regularly to hammer out the details of the blended agreement, and in December 2000 made its recommendations to the DGA's National Board. The Board approved the recommendations of the Bi-council Committee, at which point the Contract Restructuring Committee was reactivated, now chaired by Lee Shallat Chemel. This Committee put all the pieces together and took the proposed new blended agreement back to the DGA's National Board, which approved it in March 2001.

From left, back row: Gil Cates, Thomas Carter, Warren Adler, Ron Underwood, Yudi Bennett, Steven Soderbergh, Jon Turteltaub, Bob Butler, Jack Shea, Martha Coolidge, Garry Marshall and Todd Holland. Front row: Jay D. Roth, Kim Kurumada, Burt Bluestein, Barbara Roche and Jonathan Mostow.
(Photo: Ryan Miller/Capture Imaging)
click photo for larger view
With the rise of digital video becoming more and more evident, the DGA requested a mid-contract meeting with the AMPTP in June 2001, at which the Guild presented its initial blended contract proposals. The Interim Settlement Agreement that resulted from the negotiations is a first step toward officially codifying a new blended contract.

Another significant improvement gained in the negotiations was the increase in residuals secured by the Guild. In 1999, the DGA, along with SAG, AFTRA and the WGA, received a contractual agreement from the studios and networks that they would participate in a residuals study. (The WGA later decided not to participate in the study with AFTRA, SAG and the DGA.) As part of this study, the studios and networks pledged to open their financial books so that the Guilds could better quantify the economic aspects of TV programming. The DGA formed a Residuals Study Oversight Committee, co-chaired by Hal Cooper and Mel Damski, retained the legal consulting services of Ken Ziffren, and hired the Monitor Company to design and create the study. Once the study was set up, the Guild brought in the financial analysis firm of Gerard, Klauer, Mattison to help analyze the data collected from the studios' distribution and production arms. This data included economic details to which the DGA had never previously had access. The residuals study has been ongoing, and helped establish the residual pattern set in this round of Guild negotiations.

In addition to the issues regarding the blended contract and residuals improvements, for the first time ever the DGA secured a payment of $20,000 for feature film directors when a sequel is made to one of their films. This is particularly significant in that it effectively recognizes the contribution made by a director as a creator of his or her film.

In many ways, these negotiations were the DGA's most important and successful since 1987, and because of our intense preparation, we were able to achieve our objectives in an early and expedited way," said Cates. "If we hadn't been able to make the deal we did early, we of course would have had an obligation to go late. But by accomplishing what we set out to do over six months before the expiration of our contracts, we were able to spare our members — and the industry — the pain and strife that comes with a de facto or actual strike."
DGA member Christian Von Tippelskirch, DGA Assistant Eastern Executive Director Fern Wakneen and DGA Second Vice President Larry Auerbach.
click photo for larger view
On the creative rights side, the formulation of the blended contract means that the DGA's Basic Agreement creative rights will now apply to all prime time dramatic productions, regardless of the medium on which they are shot. Prior to this year, directors of prime time shows shot on tape did not enjoy the same level of creative rights as their counterparts who worked on filmed shows. This is no longer the case.

Additionally, a mechanism has now been put into place to better quantify and police the problem of late script delivery on prime time dramatic programming.

On December 15, 2001, the DGA National Board voted unanimously to recommend ratification of the new three-year collective bargaining agreements between the DGA and the AMPTP. Details of the agreement have been sent to DGA members for their scrutiny and approval.

DGA National Executive Director Jay D. Roth, AMPTP President Nick Counter and DGA Negotiations Committee Chairman Gil Cates.
click photo for larger view
Because of the DGA's desire to have the interim agreement in place before the advent of next spring's pilot season, the AMPTP agreed that this portion of the contract would be effective immediately upon ratification by the DGA membership, rather than on July 1, when the new Basic Agreement and Freelance Live and Tape Television Agreement go into effect.
I am happy that we were able to successfully conclude early negotiations on these significant issues, and I anticipate that our membership will overwhelmingly ratify the new contracts," said Jack Shea. "Our negotiating team delivered an extraordinary economic package, and at the same time ensured stability to our members, to the industry and to our community at large."

Among the highlights of the terms of the agreement are:

WAGE INCREASES*

  • Minimum salaries and residual base rates (except for directors of network prime-time and daytime serial programs) will increase by 3.5% per annum in each year of the Agreements, effective July 1, 2002, 2003 and 2004. This amounts to a compounded increase of 10.87%.
  • Directors' initial minimums for network prime time and daytime serial programs (including residuals base rates) will increase by 3.0% per annum in each year of the Agreements, effective July 1, 2002, 2003 and 2004. This amounts to a compounded increase of 9.27%.

*(DGA residuals in 2001 will total approximately $180 million.)

Gil Cates, Martha Coolidge and Jay D. Roth at DGA Board Meeting. (Photo by Joe Coomber)
click photo for larger view
FOX BROADCASTING
  • Effective July 1, 2002, the residuals for programs broadcast on Fox Broadcasting Corporation will be 80% of the residuals for programs broadcast on ABC, CBS or NBC. This number will increase to 90% effective July 1, 2003, and to 100% effective July 1, 2004. Reruns of programs produced in 2003 will remain at 90% rate until January 1, 2005. In 2001, Fox residuals amounted to $1,261,000. In 2004 they will amount to $1,994,000, an increase of 58% for DGA members
  • Effective July 1, 2004 Fox Broadcasting Corporation will be considered a network for all purposes.
Committee Members Comment
TOM LOFARO
It was, without a doubt, an historic negotiation. The last few negotiations we knew that the issue of dealing with digital production was going to come up — how it would impact the Guild, how it would affect the jurisdiction of UPMs because they aren't covered under the FLTTA. Prior to the actual negotiations with the AMPTP, months and months of work were done by a number of different committees working together. Before the 2002 contract negotiations, the medium you were shooting on determined how the contract and work was defined. What changed is that it is no longer what goes through the camera — it's the genre you're working in, not the medium you are working on.

CHERYL DOWNEY
I can't say strongly enough how grateful I am for the directors' support of the blended contract. The directors saw that if we did not solve this problem in this negotiation, they could find themselves working on long-form television where the person doing the UPM job would be strictly beholden to the producer and not to the director, and they knew that this issue was pivotal. So we all came to the table exceptionally well-prepared and united on the issue. The fact that the major issue for our united team was already in the producers' hands six months ago was a fundamental reason for the quickness of the negotiations. The other part of it was that it was really well communicated by Jay and his staff, and by Gil: If we didn't have a deal on this then we didn't have a deal, and this is a strike issue for us. I think both the preparation and unity were phenomenal.

DAN PETRIE
Jay Roth and Gil Cates did a masterful job of preparing for the negotiations and getting the total support of the membership and the committee, particularly in the area of the blended contract. I was the Chair of the negotiations a few years back, and when I saw Gil Cates and how he worked with Jay Roth it was indeed awesome. I think an agreement was crucial to the well-being of the entire industry. If it was not successful, then we were in for a very, very hard time in our industry.

HAL COOPER
I was on the committee going through the residuals study and I think the residual area was very well covered. There was a tremendous amount of preparation. Gil and Jay did such a fantastic job. I have been on negotiating committees since the 1960s, and I think Jay Roth's handling of the negotiations — his handling of the AMPTP and the representative members of the various DGA groups — bowled everyone over. It was the best handling of negotiations I've seen. I was struck by the very realistic approach — there were no "pie-in-the-sky" demands or cutbacks. It was the most realistic approach, with the recognition of today's problems and today's economy and September 11, to not waste time with the posturing of impossible goals.

FOREIGN RESIDUALS FOR TELEVISION PROGRAMS
  • The 2002 Contracts add a fourth level of residual payments. In previous contracts, there were three separate levels: an initial residual payment and two additional payments to be made when certain levels of Distributor's Foreign Gross receipts were exceeded. Once those three payments were made, no more followed, regardless of the profitability of the show. The fourth level of residual payments added by the 2002 contract extends into perpetuity, and consists of 1.2% of the Distributor's Foreign Gross receipts in excess of a certain amount based upon the length of the program.
MADE FOR BASIC CABLE RESIDUALS
  • The improved residual schedule for programming made for basic cable gains more money faster for directors by increasing residuals for runs 2–5 by 40%. All subsequent runs have gained increases as well at an overall rate of 14% across the board.

THEATRICAL SEQUEL PAYMENTS

  • The Director of a theatrical motion picture based on an original script will receive a payment of $20,000 if a sequel is produced by the same company, utilizing the same characters, etc. This is the first time such a concept has been achieved in the DGA Basic Agreement.
RUNAWAY PRODUCTION
  • No later than January 1, 2003, the AMPTP will convene a meeting with Employer representatives and representatives of the DGA, SAG, AFTRA, WGA, IATSE, Teamsters and other affected unions to discuss the problems of "runaway production" and ways of resolving or mitigating these problems, including possible contractual remedies.

RESIDUALS STUDY

  • The Employers and the DGA agree to continue to participate, together with the Screen Actors Guild, in the Industry Residuals Study.

SAFETY

  • When members of the shooting crew have worked 16 hours from crew call, the First Assistant Director may call a meeting to discuss safety issues involved with the continuation of production. This is the first time such a provision has been included in the DGA contracts.
  • The AMPTP will, as soon as practical, consult with DGA representatives for the purpose of issuing a safety "checklist" in connection with long hours, to the Employers it represents. This "checklist" should be distributed to Employers on or before February 15, 2002.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
Each Employer agreed to designate one or more high-level creative, production or programming executives to meet on an individual Employer basis at least once per year with designated representatives of the DGA.

Committee Members Comment

BURT BLUESTEIN
Part of the guidelines for doing early negotiations is that the demands list has to be very short. So what made this one most important is that we decided that we had to deal with the changing technology and the fact that relative to the new technology our contracts were becoming obsolete in terms of work rules and things like that. We wanted to get away from having a different contract based on different recording schemes. Our major focus was on the jobs that DGA members are doing regardless of the means of recording.

YUDI BENNETT
I've been involved in the proposals part of negotiations in the past, but this is the first time that I've gone through the full negotiations. There were several things that really interested me. The first was the skill required to pull this thing together. To watch Jay Roth and Gil Cates in action was amazing. They are such masters at the art of negotiating. The other thing that impressed me was that I felt the AMPTP really respected us as a group. It's great to be a part of an organization that commands that kind of respect. I also thought that the unity within the Guild was extraordinary. I never felt in that two-week period that it was about directors vs. assistant directors or tape vs. film. It always felt like we were one Guild working together.

MICHAEL ZINBERG
The preparation was very thorough. But I think what made the preparation effective was that so much work went into every category, from directors to the technical coordinators. Lee Shallat Chemel did an extremely good job of really taking some difficult subjects and finding ways to put them together so that this blended contract would work out. The thing that impressed me the most was the leadership — Jay Roth, Gil Cates, all of the committee people and the staff people did a great job. Whenever there was a question or a proposal or a counter proposal, it seemed like the information we needed was right at our fingers.

BARBARA ROCHE
What impressed me the most would have to be the cohesiveness of a really varied group of members of the Guild. In the preparation, especially regarding the blended contract, the AD/SM/PAs in conjunction with the AD/UPMs worked together for one goal — both East Coast and West Coast, all four categories — in the years preceding the negotiations. The work put in by the membership and the committee members leading up to the negotiations was key to the success of the negotiations.

BOB LEWIS
The blended contract was of the utmost importance in this negotiation, and required different categories of the Guild to be able to come together and focus on this in what was a two year process. Gil Cates was an inspired choice to lead the negotiations. It was truly inspiring to see the amount of preparation and work that was so totally focused we were able to achieve gains of historic proportions. To do that in a two-week period of negotiations was magical.

BLENDED CONTRACT
The DGA and AMPTP agreed to a historic interim "blended contract" agreement which recognizes that the methods of recording TV programming are changing, and will cover all primetime dramatic programming regardless of whether it is shot on film, traditional videotape, or digital video. The blended contract provides certainty to DGA members and producers as technology evolves. The interim agreement will expire on June 30, 2005.

The agreement applies to free television dramatic programs intended for initial broadcast on prime-time, made-for-pay/home video dramatic programs of a type made for network prime time and basic cable "high budget" dramatic programs one half-hour or more in length.

The Terms of the Interim Settlement Agreement are:

  • Any prime-time dramatic program shot "single-cameraS style will continue to be governed by the terms of the Basic Agreement, no matter how the images are recorded.
  • Any existing multi-camera series now recorded on film will continue to be covered by the BA regardless of any technological change in production of the series.
  • Any existing multi-camera series now recorded on tape or broadcast live shall continue to be covered by the Freelance Live and Tape Television Agreement.
  • All other multi-camera programs or series covered by this agreement will be governed by the BA, with the following provisions:
  • DGA has UPM jurisdiction on all productions.
  • Directors' minimum compensation will be according to the BA. Directors' residuals will be increased an average of 20% more than FLTTA rates.
  • The duties of First Assistant Directors, Second Assistant Directors and Associate Directors/Technical Coordinators employed on programs or series produced under this Interim Agreement are specifically defined.
CREATIVE RIGHTS
The DGA's Basic Agreement creative rights will now apply to all prime time dramatic productions, regardless of the medium on which they are shot.

A primary issue in the creative rights discussions involved the industry-wide problem of late script delivery in television, which impacts production costs and the ability of TV directors to do their jobs. The Guild and the AMPTP agreed on a process to address this situation:

  • Beginning September 30, 2002, the Employer will provide information to enable the Guild to monitor timeliness of script delivery on all dramatic series.
  • The Employers will meet with DGA representatives on a Company-by-Company basis to consider solutions to the problem of late script deliveries. These meetings may involve showrunners, network and production executives, individual writers, and/or the Writers Guild of America.
  • The AMPTP and DGA agreed to an arbitration to determine the appropriate relief for late script delivery.
  • The Employers have also agreed to meet with the DGA's TV Creative Rights Committee to review progress on this issue.

The Creative Rights Committee also discussed concerns regarding the transmission of images (other than promotional material and dailies) from the set or location. It was agreed that the Guild will bring any instances of abuse to the Creative Rights Committee, which will address the situation promptly.

Table of Contents     Top of Page