| |
Distrtibute This! Independent Film Distribution Seminar
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Left to right: Bob Berney, Senior VP of Marketing and Distribution for IFC, Eamonn Bowles, President of Magnolia Pictures, Jennifer Todd, producer, Gary Garfinkel, VP of Acquisitions for Showtime Networks, Elvis Mitchell, New York Times film critic, Doug Mankoff, President of Echo Lake Productions, Penelope Spheeris, DGA director member, Mike McClellan, VP and Co-Head Film Buyer of Landmark Theaters and Allison Anders, DGA director member.
photo by Robert Hale
Click picture for larger view.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a transcript of a panel discussion on Independent Film distribution held at the Directors Guild of America on Monday, December 12, 2001.
|
GEORGE HICKENLOOPER: Good evening. My name is George Hickenlooper, and I will take four minutes to welcome you on behalf of the DGA and its Independent Directors Committee to Distribute This!, our seminar, which we hope will seriously address not only the challenges but the crisis in the state of independent film distribution. We are grateful to our panelists for participating and we are happy to see such a strong turnout since addressing these issues, is critical for the survival of independent filmmakers today.
With the blessing of the DGA, the Independent Directors Committee, or IDC, was established four years ago. Filmmakers such as Steven Soderbergh, Penelope Spheeris, Allison Anders, Rick King, Spike Jonze, Michael Uno, Michael Apted, Mary Lambert, Gary Walkow, Alexander Payne, Charles Burnett, and myself, to only name a few, formed the committee to address the challenges facing independent filmmakers and to expose them to the benefits of the DGA. These benefits include the current Low Budget Agreement that protects the director's creative rights and residuals while allowing for flexibility in salaries and staffing, as well as our support of a diverse array of organizations and festivals within the independent film community. In fact, on your way out there is material you can pick up outside on the security console about the upcoming Sundance and Slamdance Festivals, which are both sponsored by the DGA.
In addition to this seminar, the IDC has not just been active in addressing the herculean challenge of getting distribution for independent filmmakers but we've also been doing something about it. Two years ago, the DGA's Directors Finder Series was established by the IDC to help find distribution for orphaned films of merit. The IDC is pleased to say that the series has been a great success and has resulted in the sale, acquisition, and distribution of almost ten Guild members' independent films.
Not long ago, it was perceived that the real challenge in independent film was getting the damn thing made. The reality today is that most of you can get it made; unfortunately, most if not all of you will find it next to impossible to get it distributed. I would say that the most accurate definition of independent film today means films independent of distribution. In the current marketplace, the ugly reality is that independent film doesn't really exist. Independent film distributors have become dependents owned by giant conglomerates who often apply the same formula to independently-produced films as they do to Hollywood movies.
Today, most acquisitions executives of major distributors are in the business of passing on films. Most are too fearful of losing their jobs; it is always easier to say no than to take risks. But a business without risks is a business that doesn't grow financially. For the last decade, independent films each year continued to lose more and more money. A business without risks means a cinema that doesn't grow creatively but panders to a kind of sheep mentality. Recently, a high-ranking executive from a specialty division of a major studio passed on a critically-acclaimed film telling the producer it wasn't edgy enough. They were looking for edgy this year, they were looking for films like Memento, to which the producer replied, but you passed on Memento. The executive answered, I know, but this year we would have bought it. It almost sounds as absurd as a scene out of Catch-22, but the reality is that it's this kind of narrow-mindedness that continues to hurt film overall.
One very influential film critic a few years ago proclaimed that the American cinema is dead, that it had descended into a kind of stylishly-hollow, ironically-detached, carnival of pretense. Well I say the American cinema is not dead; it is alive and well; it just isn't being distributed. Masterful independent films like Tony Barbieri's One, Rob Schmidt's Saturn and Lisanne Skyler's Getting To Know You, aren't getting picked up because they don't subscribe to the current vogue that dominates the marketplace.
Not long ago I had dinner with Peter Bogdanovich and we discussed how if a number of classic American films were made today, films like The Last Picture Show, Five Easy Pieces, Two Lane Blacktop, or even Midnight Cowboy, they'd be lucky to get a premier spot on cable television. And you know what? Sadly, it's probably true. For many young filmmakers, the doors to distribution are closed. Many feel they can no longer be true to their own voices without fear of not being seen. In this highly-commercialized world, they are living in fear of being ignored, and now the work is beginning to collectively show that. In other words, our model for making independent film is beginning to look more and more like the studio model.
Tonight we ask what can be done before it gets worse? This is no longer just a crisis in independent film distribution. It has and will continue to become a crisis in American culture. We can no longer afford to say, after all, it's only a movie. As Hollywood continues to gain a stronger and stronger foothold into how we see ourselves and how the rest of the world sees us, we must demand not only better from the marketplace, but we also must demand better from ourselves.
And now I would like to introduce Elvis Mitchell of the New York Times.
Elvis Mitchell: Here we go. I think we all come to realize that independent film now means as much as the phrase alternative music or coffee house. It's just a marketing rubric to make a film feel like it's different, edgy, a departure from something. But I think what we all demand from independent films, what we want from a movie, to sort of be moved, entertained, to find that thing that's both idiosyncratic and universal. And despite a record number of movie theaters in this country, and a record number of films being released by studios, what pictures are people talking about this year? In The Bedroom, Memento, The Business of Strangers. In other words, movies that got made outside the studio system; the films studios didn't want. They're now generating a buzz and all of a sudden people are trying to correct their behavior because of it. What this means essentially is that nobody knows anything. But now people pretend more than ever they know exactly what they're talking about.
What we need to do in independent film, in looking at this, is just to sort of say we don't know what it is we want, but we know what filmmakers have to offer. We have to seek this out. It's why festivals exist. And an astonishing number of pictures that never get picked up play at film festivals. So the first thing I would like to say to all of us is go. And get your movies there, because you create a buzz, people talk about it, and it's a way to get work and get your movies seen, which is why I hope you make movies in the first place.
We've got a pretty great group of panelists up here to talk about this. Penelope Spheeris has critiqued Western civilization a number of times, with her Decline of Western Civilization films, remarkable movies about music, society, and youth. Next to her, film buyer for Landmark Theatres, Mike McClellan, a big friend to independent film. Next a maker of an amazing independent film, Allison Anders, whose latest movie is Things Behind The Sun, but whose work includes of course Mi Vida Loca and Gas, Food and Lodging, a great filmmaker. And the producer of Things Behind The Sun, Doug Mankoff. Another friend of independent film, Gary Garfunkel from Showtime, where Allison's film ended up after a good run at Sundance. Also, Eamonn Bowles, whose previous company, The Shooting Gallery, basically went out of his way to make a home for independent film and now he's got a new company, Magnolia. Of Team Todd, Jennifer Todd, whose movies go from Austin Powers to Memento, so we'll get a chance to ask her about that. And at the end Bob Berney of IFC films, but got his start with Landmark Cinema.
I want to ask you guys, we're going to start by talking a little bit about Memento, which as we know had a rather interesting history. I saw it for the first time just before the Cannes Film Festival of 2000, where I was sure the power of the New York Times would somehow find it distribution. But that didn't quite happen, did it?
Jennifer Todd: No, it didn't. That was May and we still didn't have distribution then. What happened basically is -- I'll lead you up to when Bob came in because he has the second half of the story -- but we made the film with a company called New Market Capital. They were already involved with the financing when I came on to the project. It was a script and Chris Nolan was attached to direct it, and he had previously done Following, which was this little black-and-white film he shot in London that got a limited distribution. And we cast it; we went to Brad Pitt, we waited for three months, which was New Market's idea, and Chris was a little worried about such a big star. And after that we went to Guy and we put our cast in place. Carrie Ann Moss. All the actors are people who read it without offers and were interested in it enough to be able to make a commitment for us to put the movie together. And Carrie Ann, I think, fulfilled enough of the foreign requirements -- together, her and Guy and Joe Pantoliano, all meant enough for Summit to cover a lot of the budget from foreign, and that's why New Market was able to make the film.
So then we went off and we kind of made the film in a bit of isolation. We made it and we finished it, and we never previewed it or anything like that. And then we screened it almost two years ago, the Friday night before the Oscars. We screened it for every distributor in different screening rooms around town. And I was telling these guys, that I had the Miramax screening room. I watched it with Harvey and Meryl Poster and ten other Miramaxers and the second the movie was over, they passed. To my face. They just said, nope, not for us. And basically the same thing had happened all over town. To my sister, who was with Artisan and Fox and to Aaron Ryder who was with the rest of them. And we didn't get a single bite on the film. And we all were so depressed, we couldn't get drunk fast enough that night. And honestly, I never thought that the film would see the light of day, and I thought I was going to end up showing it to my friends on videotape. But we all just kind of hung in there and eventually a couple companies kind of circled around the film, but no offers came to be.
So I give these two guys from New Market credit because they were so in love with the film themselves, that they said, you know what? We're going to distribute it ourselves. So they hired Bob Berney to come in and actually self-distribute the film, which ended up costing them a bit of money in the beginning, and it was kind of a great leap of faith. So... I'll let him tell the second half.
Bob Berney: They had asked me to screen it. I went to the screening, I didn't know any of this story that she just told. I didn't know. And I saw it and went back to meet with them thinking, well, what do you want? What's the problem? I thought they were -- I didn't know why they wanted to meet, I thought they had a deal and they were like, no, there's no distribution. They were really thinking that it wasn't going to be released theatrically, they would sell it straight to ancillary. So I had done a similar thing with a film Happiness, October Films', the parent company Universal forbid them to release it. And I had done a similar thing with Good Machine. And they're friends with New Market, they'd worked together, so they knew I'd done this type of project. So I put together a brief budget and they asked how much does it take just to give it the shot? And right in the meeting, we just shook hands, we had no written deal, and they gave me a million dollars and said, start. They said, we don't know anything about distribution, but we believe in the film and we're willing to put our own money up.
So from that point we started putting together a team of people to do it. Kind of like I did Happiness, with MPRM, which is a public relations company; Rodgers & Cowan, which also did publicity; with the producers and the director, and Jonathan the director's brother, who had done originally written the short story but designed the website for the film, which was already in the works. And I took the approach of organic marketing. It was really there. The film delivered, and the website was amazing. We started a year ahead of the release of the film, and the real luxury was from the New Market guys having no pressure. I could pick the date, I could take the time. It was just -- it was amazing that they were willing to just bet on their own film. And also, although they knew my work with Happiness and we had a connection with Good Machine, they were really willing to just do it. And although we had meetings all the time with Chris and Jennifer and everybody, it was one of those sort of things that everything fell together. It was a group of people that just had a blast together, and it went on from there. We started early with the website. We went to the Venice Film Festival, and just built and built until kind of the fever pitch. And really, it became one of the biggest indie films of the year. And then subsequently, now, on video and DVD. It's a huge success.

 |
EM: I've got to ask you. Were you guys thinking in terms of audience at all when you were having these meetings and being told that the movie just wouldn't sell or people wouldn't like it?

JT: Well, honestly, I think that when you have people pass the way they did, I think originally we thought of the film, what it ended up being, is that it was a fun, sort of psychological thriller. It made people think; we thought it would be a broader audience. But then when we got so many 'no's, we were thinking, I guess we made more of an art film than we thought. And that it was going to be more for this crowd, maybe not for the people on the street. I mean, that's what we were being told, so we weren't sure.
What's interesting, too, is we went to Venice, Deauville, and then Toronto, and then ended up at Sundance. We went over the summer, and you could tell, it did very well with Europeans. And then we came out overseas first. And not only did we play well, but I was on vacation and a 16-year-old French girl was telling me how it was her favorite movie and it hadn't come out here yet. And I could tell it was broader there than we were expecting it to be here. And so it was a sign, but you know, you just don't know.

BB: I think audiences really liked it. And that's what the distribution community really missed. Because I remember running into a studio exec maybe a couple months before Memento came out in the US, and he was like, what are you doing? And I said, well, I'm working on Memento. And he goes, audiences will reject that immediately. And I was like... you know. So it wasn't about, he was like, no, we love it, all the distributors love it, but the audiences are going to hate it, and they're never going to accept the ending. Forget it. And I think people love to be fooled, you know, in a smart way.

JT: And what I give the critics and the people who were behind the movie from the beginning, is when they wrote about the movie they said, this is the movie that studios thought was too complicated for you to understand or was too sophisticated. That became a little bit of a marketing hook for some of the press that we got on the film, and then it became this word of mouth kind of discovery. Basically it became, don't tell the secret, or whatever the hooks are needed, it's a movie that you want to stand around the water cooler and discuss the next day. And I think that they missed that a lot. I think that anytime that people can feel like it's an active participation sort of film and that there's a hook to it and you have to get it, you can talk about it. You know, I just feel like none of them really saw that.

EM: Do we have the trailer for Memento? Let's take a look at that.
[TRAILER RUNS -- TRAILER ENDS]
I think the real mystery is why we're up here when the trailer is showing, but that's another conversation all together. Eamonn, let's talk a little bit about what Shooting Gallery was, what it did. I really want to know how you guys found Croupier, which is the case of another movie that was thought to have no audience whatsoever.

Eamonn Bowles: Well basically, the Shooting Gallery film series came about because one of the problems of going to film festivals, seeing all these films, --and I know George had a very passionate sort of accusatory tone about distributors and stuff-- is that it is really, really hard to distribute independent films. The economics are daunting. I can't say this strongly enough. I mean, there's a graveyard of independent film companies, you can just see their wreckage by the side of the road. It's not that we don't love films, we do. And I go to film festivals all the time. I'd see a film and go, oh my God, you know what, I love that film, but how am I going to make that work? I don't know.
So with the Shooting Gallery film series, we were able to get corporate sponsorship. We went to them saying, hey, we're saving independent films. Get behind this, it'll be good for your products. And it worked. They gave us money to defray the costs of getting a slate of films going. So we partnered with Loews Theaters in most markets and Landmark in a couple of markets and some other theaters and we basically had a home of 15 to 17 cities nationwide that the film would get a nationwide release on. So on May 6 film X would be released all across the country all at once, with a fair amount of advertising support behind it, not just like a little toe in the water release, let's see how it goes, and then we'll open another theater maybe. A full, hell or high water, a full nationwide release. And for me it was like so much fun because I was able to go out and get all these films that I had loved and figure out how make the economics work. And actually be able to give them a legitimate shot in the marketplace. And the films that did well, that showed that they would have good word of mouth, got supported more. Like we put good money after good basically, and that's pretty much how it happened.
Our first one was Judy Berlin, which for me was sort of a poster child for the program. Here's a film that played Sundance, Eric Mendelssohn won Best Director, and everyone I talked to liked the film. Critics, distributors, everyone liked the film, but you know what? It was a film about unsexy, middle-aged people in the suburbs, black and white, not quite a rousing, cathartic film. And yet it was beautiful. It was just this incandescent work. And I was like, this is why we're in business, to pick up films like this. We put it out, it actually did very well for its limited release. It did over half a million dollars, and for the economics of what we were doing, it did very well.
Croupier was a film that, to be honest, I just got this fax in my office one day about this film, Croupier. And I knew Mike Hodges' work, and I said oh, I didn't even know Mike Hodges made another film. And attached to it, it had all these kind of glowing reviews from the London press. And it had a really nice looking, almost like an ad image, of Clive Owen standing over a roulette wheel. I'm like, what's this? So next Tuesday, I RSVP'd, went to the screening.
I sat in the screening with a bunch of New York critics, and I think New Yorker Films was the only other distributor there. And the film unfolded, I'm watching it, and I'm just thinking, God, I hope New Yorker doesn't like this because I really want this. And the guy had no other offers. Film Four had it, and apparently the sales agent did not really feel very strongly about the film. It played in the London market a few years ago and it kind of got the code word crappier, was what people were calling it. And so everybody -- a lot of people didn't even actually see it because the initial word of mouth was so bad on the film. I just thought it was terrific, I was really surprised.
I will say one thing I was a little surprised at. For a film where you have the protagonist being so cold and so cerebral and keeping the audience at arm's length. The fact that it became a word of mouth film -- it was actually very gratifying to me that the people would embrace a film like that. Because it didn't have that warm, cuddly, toe-tapping ending. And that was actually great to me.
And one of the things with the film, when we were releasing the film, it was very important to me that we keep it sort of in -- I won't say a controlled environment -- but we really kept it in the art theaters for a long time. Because I thought that those would be the people that would really appreciate the sort of craft involved and the use of voiceover, which was sort of alienating to most other audiences. We kind of resisted putting a wider release into the malls for quite a while. Because we really wanted to build up that core of really, really strong, compelling word of mouth. Not just, yeah, I liked it, it was pretty good. But, oh no, you've got to see it, it's great. And if we went out to the malls right away and released that film widely, there would be a lot of people exposed to the film who would go like, it was okay, I didn't think it was that good. You know? It was really important to me to keep it on a smart filmgoer level for as long as possible. And it ran all summer and actually kept going. So I was really kind of happy about that.

 |
EM: It sounds almost like what you're saying is you have to guide the audience.

EB: Context is -- I mean, not everything, but context is so important when you're releasing a film. There's just no question about it. What the audience expectations are going to be before they go in. If they think they're going to see a nice light, frothy comedy and you give them nice frothy comedy with some heavy handed drama at the end, they freak out. Contextualizing a film is the biggest thing that marketers have to do in releasing a film to the public.
EM: You talked about the difficulty in navigating the shoals of marketing these films and being a distribution company, I guess you weathered some of that yourself.

EB: You mean the dashed ship of the Shooting Gallery?

EM: Yes, that's what I meant, yes.

EB: Yes, the Shooting Gallery was -- it was kind of interesting because while they were having their sort of best run as a film company, and the Shooting Gallery film series, which both economically and critically was very, very successful, and we had just produced You Can Count On Me, which was ditto. And we just kind of had this incredible expansion in the Internet world, which I hear was pretty hot. And it really sunk the ship. It was really kind of buy low, sell high. And sort of chasing those dollars really sunk the ship and it was kind of ironic because the core business of the film group was really doing better than ever.

EM: But it shows that you can. That there is a market. You find these films that you love, you can find a way to get them out there. There is, despite what we're told, this wisdom that audiences don't want to be involved in some complication, you've proven that there are.

EB: Well actually, the one thing most gratifying to me was that by the third time out, the film series was picking up momentum. You know, generally these things, you open up with a lot of fanfare, oh great, it's a gimmick, you know, they're putting these films together. And then it dies off and gradually the audience starts to ebb away. Our audience was growing. And that, to me, was like the single biggest encouragement. I have to say, before I did the film series, I was very dispirited about trying to get films out to the audience. And I was really re-energized after doing that. It was really the most fun thing I've had to do because it was just kind of going out and seeing films and going, you know what? I know that's hard to market, but that's a fucking great film, let's do it. And having some sort of economic safety net, that you were able to do that. And the fact that it was working was -- felt pretty damn good.

EM: Well, you were helped too by the fact that there's such a surfeit of screens that Loews really needs stuff for those screens that were sort of bombing the third week of X-Men.

EB: No question, no question. And Loews gave us basically their crappiest screens around the country. We took them. We were playing at the Fairfax here, which was a second-run house. Actually, it's not a bad theater. I like the theater, but all around the country we were getting the screens that were hard for them to fill. But we were creating value for them, in fact, one of the theaters in Washington, they turned back into a first-run art house because we had done so well with our program there, that they went from this second-run house to a first-run art house.

EM: So what's your deal now?

EB: Magnolia Pictures, which is a company -- we're sort of trying to meld a little bit of the Shooting Gallery film series sensibilities and we're also trying to start -- we're picking up art theaters around the country. We're opening one in Dallas at the end of the year and we're going out to other markets around the country. Sort of to give it a home. One of the real problems in art film distribution is the exhibition situation. Outside of Landmark, there's really no dedicated screens nationwide to art films. And that is really one of the problems. If you have to play in a mall theater with your art film, it's really, really hard. And there's just no question about it that audiences will go to a theater that's dedicated to playing art films all the time, that's just like their home, their home base. They know what to expect going in there. And there's just a lot of cities in the United States that are so under-served with art theaters. It's really one of the big problems there is.

EM: What we're going to do now is take a look at the Things Behind The Sun trailer and then talk about that. Can we get a chance --

Doug Mankoff: Can we actually wait and do that at a slightly later stage? Is that okay?

 
EM: Absolutely. You know, I'd like to talk right now about Things Behind The Sun if that's okay with you kids, here?

DM: No, I thought that might be a good thing for Gary to talk about with Showtime. But I wanted to sort of start with the kind of story.

EM: Please, go ahead.

DM: Sorry, I didn't mean to be so controlling.
 
EM: Your house now, go ahead. What have you got?

DM: I guess what's unique about my company is that we're a financier. We help finance independent films. And so we have to think about the bottom line and we have to think about our investors and getting them a return. Not that investors are only in it for the money but that's certainly part of it.
Last spring Howard Cohen from UTA approached us with a script that we just loved, and it was Things Behind The Sun, that Allison had written with Kurt Voss. And Allison and her producing partner, Dan Hassid, had tried to make the film for awhile with some stars at a higher budget but were frustrated with that process. And Allison wanted to make this film the way she wanted to make it and was willing to do it -- wanted to do it really without star cast. And we said, that's fine, but we really have to do it at a low budget because if we don't, if we're going to have two leads who are not well known, we've obviously got to keep it down. And Allison said, fine, I want to get this movie made and I want to get it made the way I want to make it. So we went into this knowing that there were going to be some challenges. In that the film is -- there's tough subject matter. And it wasn't going to have leads that people knew. But what was really exciting to us was the chance to work with Allison, whose films we really admired. All of which had been theatrical except for Mi Vida Loca which was originally supposed to be for Showtime, then went to HBO.

 |
Allison Anders: ____ maybe one.

 
DM: And did have a theatrical run.

AA: The only one, that kind of scares me. I don't know if that's why it was the only one they ever did theatrically, but it did pretty well actually, Mi Vida Loca.

DM: And Allison is well loved by the film festivals and we felt that there was a good chance the film would get into a film festival, so we said we would do it. And sure enough the film turned out wonderfully and Sundance invited it to be a premiere. And after the screening, which we all felt went very well, some buyers did approach us and actually it was a good situation because we had one very good offer from a theatrical company that wanted to do a push for Kim Dickens and maybe for Don also, for an Academy Award nomination. I mean, they were going to put some money behind that. They were going to put some money into P&A and they were going to give us an advance. It wasn't the number anybody was really hoping for, but it probably would have ultimately, between that and foreign sales, the investors would have broken even. And then at some point in the conversation, Howard Cohen who was selling the film was talking about other people who had seen it and Showtime, they really liked it and would like to bid on it, but -- and then we sort of moved on. And we asked Howard to kind of back up and say that again, and said well maybe we should get Showtime to be, no offense, a stalking horse. Maybe they can help get the number up from this theatrical distributor. And what wound up happening is that we saw how much Showtime loved the film and we all started to think about this in a serious way. And they came in with an offer which was more than the theatrical offer, and then I thought -- and this is when I want to turn it over to you -- I thought, uh oh, we've got a problem because this is that sort of weird situation where maybe the financiers want it to go straight to television but that may not be what the filmmaker wants to do. And I thought maybe we were going to have sort of a crisis here, but --

AA: That's why nobody told me for a long time. Yes, so nobody told me. I was on a train actually when I found out. And at first I was like, no, no, this can't be. This can't -- and then I called a girlfriend, I started thinking about it because I had just had an experience where I had been at the Wexner Center in Columbus, Ohio, which is just this wonderful place at the university there. And they show a lot of films, and they actually do series where they show your whole body of work and then you get to pick films also to show as well. But I had gone there with my boyfriend at the time, and I wanted to see The Gift, which had all these huge stars in it, the Sam Raimi movie. I assumed it was going to be packed and so we go to this 24-plex theater, 24-plex theater in Columbus, and it was like this graveyard. There was nobody in the box offices, there was no -- you couldn't even figure out who to buy tickets from. So I thought, oh God, this doesn't bode well for my screening tonight. You know, because maybe people just like to play video games here, I don't know. But I went and so we saw The Gift with like seven other people. I was like stunned. I was like, oh shit, what is going on with movies right now? But to my surprise, when I went to my screening, it was packed at the Wexner Center.
So I was like, it kind of had made me start to think that like if I could have a distribution where lots of people saw it in some other capacity but didn't see it in malls, you know, but that saw it in very specific places, then I would be perfectly pleased to have that kind of distribution. With this particular film. This film in particular because it was very film. The film's about rape, and I felt like I wanted -- I had seen how the film had played with audiences and in particular rape survivors, or people touched by rape, and I just thought, I really want those people to be able to see this movie. And I had had two very disappointing experiences back to back with my previous movies in the distribution process, and I just thought I can't take another, I just can't take it again. Like where the third week, and I really felt like the theatrical distributors, I adored them, and I thought I know they love the movie, but they're not going to love it after that second weekend, they're not going to love it anymore. And I really want people to see this movie. So I started thinking about it, and I talked to a girlfriend of mine at Sundance Channel, Liz Mann, who had left me a message at home just to tell me how much she loved the film at Sundance and we just talked. I just started talking it through with her, and she said, you know, I just think it's so the better thing for you to do. And she said the classic thing, she just said, the thing that turned my head was she said, if you can get past the vanity of the theatrical screening then I think you'll really see that there's no downside for you here. So, it meant I had to talk to my actors about it, and had to talk to people, but ultimately -- and then we went and talked to Showtime and it was just incredible. The kind of things that I could ask for that would just, you know, create such like sighs and huffs, like a benefit screening for a rape crisis center. Just down the line. I can't even begin to tell you all the support that I had. It was tremendous. And at the end of the day, I think everybody must have been shocked that I was like, yes, let's go with the Showtime because it was just one of those things where it was really, not really a conventional way to go. Especially when we had a theatrical offer from a really wonderful group. But I still -- and it's been great because I knew that there were rape survivors in little towns that were never going to see this movie. Or even in big towns, that wouldn't see it after the second weekend or whatever. So I don't know. I had a great time with that whole experience. I mean, I talked to Jerry Offsay shortly after it premiered on Showtime. So it premieres basically in four different time zones -- is it four different time zones?

 |
DM: Three.

AA: Three time zones. So he said, the numbers, they do have their numbers too, and the numbers translates to about five million people saw your movie. On the night that it premiered, five million people. That was like stunning to me. That was in one day, so it was basically three screenings that five million people saw the movie. For me, that was the whole deal, was I wanted people to see it. And they took it so seriously. And it was the first time I ever had a poster I loved. And I was scared to death because I was scared of the poster, I was scared of the trailer, which you're going to see in a minute, because when the trailer came to me, I was like, oh God, you know, here I go. I have to put this trailer in because I'm always scared when I see those things. Because I don't know how to fix it. I don't know how to sell these movies. But I know when it's just confused and wrong, but I don't know what to do to make it better. You know? Because I think, I don't know how to sell anything. But the trailer, I loved. Like immediately. I had two little things, which were basically just extend shots. I couldn't believe it. I was like, oh my God. And I even got chills watching it. It was crazy. And the poster, I really loved, except the only thing with the poster was the wording was a little strong, because it was like robbed of his manhood, raped of her innocence. I was like, wow, that's a little blatant. But is that really? I mean, I thought -- but I said, just tell me, you want as many people to watch this as possible, right? Because with distributors, you don't always know what the agenda is. Do you really want people to see my movie or not? You don't know. But with them, I knew that they really wanted people to watch the movie. So all I had to do was say, you really want as many people to watch this as possible. And they said, yes, that's what we're doing. And I said, okay, I'll go for it, you know, that's fine. I sign off on that, because I knew that they knew their audience really well and that they were going to get people watching. Which, you know, incredibly they did.

Gary Garfinkel: It's amazing what you find out on panel discussions. So Allison had her fears, a lot of what George was saying in his opening remarks, I feel are true for me. I'm scared of saying yes, I'm scared of saying no to a movie that becomes big, I'm scared of getting fired. I'm scared that the glare off my head is blinding everybody out there.

EM: No, I always squint like this, it's okay.

GG: I'm scared of a lot. But what I'm not scared of is -- I'm not scared when I see a movie that really hits me. We were at Sundance late in the festival. The movie was screening, I think, at the Egyptian, which is all the way up at the top of the hill. And my colleagues and I were just going to stay there at the theater for another movie, but as soon as I saw that, I knew that Jerry, the head of programming at Showtime, was at dinner down the hill. So I wasn't really dressed properly; we were just supposed to stay at the theater and jump right into the van afterwards. And I braved that Main Street walk downhill; I walked miles in the cold, just so I could get to the head and tell Jerry that I saw this movie that I think would be absolutely perfect for the kind of programming that we try to bring our audience. And he immediately was interested, and after I told him what the story was about, and once we got back to town everybody screened the film and we just went in aggressively. And I think there was a lot of negotiating, a lot of back and forthing with all kinds of things on the movie, but Allison came in and Doug came in, the whole crew came in, and I think what Allison was saying is true on the opposite side for us. It was just a good situation for everybody involved. The movie was seen by probably more people via the Showtime telecast than it would have been seen had it been released initially theatrically. And from our perspective, the movie gained -- got so much good publicity. It had great reviews, and so that was a good thing for Showtime to be affiliated with. So that was just a classical win-win situation, I think.

EM: Do you find that filmmakers though can be a little defensive when you come to them and they are sort of pining for that big theatrical distribution deal that doesn't happen?

GG: I don't think it's defensive. I think there is apprehension. I think people make movies for a theater and unless you're making a TV movie you don't go out and make a movie and say, wow, I hope this becomes a Showtime premiere or something. That's not the point. So it's really a matter of trying to sit down, which is exactly what happened with us. We sat several times and we tried to explain what we could do, what we could bring to the film. And then it's just up to the people who have the rights to the film to make up their minds if they want to go that route or not.

EM: If it's okay with Doug, I think I'd like to show the trailer right now for Things Behind The Sun.
[TRAILER RUNS--- TRAILER ENDS]
How closely did you guys work together on the trailer, I'm curious. Did you talk a lot with them, Allison, or --

AA: You know, I had a meeting in New York with the people there, and we talked here as well. And then basically they just went for it. And then sent it to me. Told me that it was coming. In fact, someone from Showtime called me on a Saturday. I couldn't believe anyone was actually concerned that I that I would be there to receive it and see it. From the beginning, I thought, oh, that's exactly what I want -- that's the movie, it really is what the movie is about. And I loved that they used the Nick Drake song and the Sonic Youth stuff, and so I was happy.

GG: Yes, that was part of the discussion that we were having early on. We were cognizant of how personal this film was and it was important before we did the deal to make sure that Allison was involved in everything. So we worked collaboratively on just about everything creative.

EM: Penelope, can you talk about the marketing and the distribution of Decline III

Penelope Spheeris: Well, since I was the creator and, actually, with the last one I financed it as well, I had total control. So that was helpful. Weren't you supposed to show some visual or something, because that was going to inspire me?
 
EM: I just wanted to make sure it was okay with Doug. You good with this, Doug?

PS: I don't know, we've got to check with Doug right?

EM: Well, I just thought we'd talk a little bit first, since we just have one clip, but I've lost control, the wheels are off the car. So we can go to the clip and then I'll quietly leave the theater and leave these people to speak amongst themselves.

PS: -- they were going to show this still because I was going to talk about the first Decline and so I think if they have that still. Were you able to hook up the still thing or what? No?

EM: I guess not, because I hear -- they have a slide.

PS: Well, okay then. I'll just say that we were supposed to see this still of the opening of the first Decline, which was in 1980. And it was -- oh my goodness, we may have it. Yes, this was on Hollywood Boulevard, February 13, 1980, when we were told by the Mann Theater chain that we couldn't book a night in there because no one would come to the movie. And they had to shut down Hollywood Boulevard. Do you have that other still? It's a little more easy to read up there. There we go. The kids were not really all that rowdy, there were just so many of them. And it was back in the day when like flyers actually worked and everybody knew about it. And they came out in force. I mean, there were 300 motorcycle cops, they had to shut down the Boulevard. I got a letter from Darryl Gates, the police chief, that said, don't ever show this movie in this city again. And I thought, well, I must have done my job, you know. All right, enough of the still, thank you.

BB: That would be your quote on the one sheet. Darryl Gates, "Don't show this movie."

EM:: Yes, I think he's the film critic who said American film is dead.

PS: Yes, well, what I was dealing with was these two twin brothers. You may know who they are, Mike, over at the Mann chain way back then. And they looked just alike and you'd walk in and you'd say, please let me play my movie in here just one night. And the one guy would say, no, you can't play it. And then the other guy would talk to him and you'd go, oh my God, I'm seeing double. But whatever. I could not get them -- they said, no one will come to see it. So what happened was I went across the street to whatever that movie theater was. I've forgotten now. And they said, we'll give you one showing at midnight. And so it played. And it actually proved itself that one night. But then after that they wouldn't play it because they thought their theaters were going to be torn up. So what we did is we went down and four-walled what I think is the Fairfax theater now, down on Fairfax and Beverly, is that what it is? And we paid them I think something like $4,000 a week or something. And the movie just kicked butt. I mean, for whatever time it played there it was 20 years ago, so I don't remember how many weeks it was -- but I do know that when the movie left there, they remodeled the theater. They changed it from a single theater into like four, they chopped it up. But after that, with the Decline, I never really had any distribution with it. It got booked into schools and kind of put me on the map as a director though. I would get calls from like, I'm the secretary, I'm Barry Diller's secretary and we'd like to have you send a print over. And I'm like, that dude is so rich, why can't he go buy a ticket? And I wouldn't send my movie, --that was one of my big mistakes in my career.
But actually we should probably talk about the experience I had with Mike McClellan on the Decline, Part III, which is a film that I made 20 years later in 1997. But I financed it myself from having sold out for so many years to the studios. It cost $250,000 and we shot it in various formats. And actually -- do you remember how we got connected up?

Mike McClellan: I think you called.
 
  
PS: Desperation again.

MM: Right. And unlike most theater chains or theaters, we actually take the filmmakers' calls, believe it or not. And we had already had a relationship through other colleagues at Landmark with Penelope, who is such a very passionate and dedicated filmmaker. At any rate, the first step is just to show the film to us and then we can take it from there. So we can get hooked in with our marketing team. And on this particular film, since this was not a particularly music-driven film, perhaps we should see the trailer now.
PS: I don't know, Doug? It's okay. We're cool. Elvis, what do you think?

EM: I'm just here for the water. Yes, can we see the trailer now? Thank you.

PS:It's really got cheesy narration because I couldn't afford a narrator.
[TRAILER RUNS -- TRAILER ENDS]
It really is so cheesy. I did the narration myself, isn't that sad. Decline of Western Civilization. But I am in eternal gratitude to myself and to Mike McClellan for playing the film as they did. Maybe, Mike, you should explain to them the process we went through when we -- I would have to deal with the various theaters around the country with their advertising departments, but you know more about that than me.

MM: Yes, precisely. So once we saw the film, then we could go to our marketing team within Landmark, and we could target the audience and know exactly who we're going to draw from. Since this is a niche film, it has a very specific and small audience, then we decided to work with an intermediary, which is an important step for us because even though we are very receptive to working with filmmakers, we actually prefer to work with some kind of a distributor or someone who would do a service deal, who is known to us. We do have limited resources and so many manhours, and it's a very labor-intensive process when you work directly with a filmmaker because unlike Penelope, there are many filmmakers who simply don't know the business side of this particular business. So there is a certain degree of trust that you have to already lay a groundwork for, which they may or may not have, and simply explaining the process to them is entirely too much for us to handle. So we usually like to deal with people who know that, and so we put Penelope in touch with a --

PS: Oh, he doesn't want anyone to know because this guy that bought that third Decline, he works for the studios now, he doesn't want anybody to know his name. I know, it's mysterious, isn't it? But anyway, this guy -- I'm not going to tell you his name -- we're going to call him Richard, okay? Richard actually booked the theaters, because otherwise I would have been like calling Mike and bugging him all day, going where can I put my movie next? But it played all around the country, and Richard, this guy, booked it and he didn't take the money though. The money -- like I couldn't believe it, I would go out to my mailbox and there would be checks from showing my movie over in Las Vegas or Dallas or Maryland, wherever you guys have theaters. And it was totally cool.

EM: Mike, can I ask you a question? I just wonder, does it help with you guys because you know specifically who your audience is?

MM:: Right.

EM: In a case like this, is that really where you guys come in?

MM: Yes, exactly, because one of the factors that we looked at is we didn't think that the punkers would necessarily go see this film. So the theaters became a safe environment for people who are intimidated by that particular subculture. So they actually feared -- like I wouldn't be found in a punk club, myself personally, but I would certainly go to the --

PS: That's why I make these movies, so you guys don't have to go.

MM: I thought you were breaking down these barriers. At any rate, once you identify that audience and you offer that environment, then that becomes a safe haven. And we put it on the Nuart calendar, and if you're not familiar with the Nuart here in town, then you should be. We have calendars all over town. And that was the most successful run in the country, if I'm not mistaken.

PS:Yes, it was. At the Nuart there. And what they did is their theater -- the guys in their art department would make up these flyers, and for each city they would like put the theater on it and where it played and when, and they would have people that worked in the theater and they would bring them around. And sometimes I would hire those people to bring the flyers around. And each theater, I don't know, I'd probably spend, what, $4,000 or $5,000 per theater maybe, tops, for advertising. Each city is different. Like New York is very expensive for the advertising. And then they would take that -- once they trusted me, like I had to pay it first, and then once they trusted me they took it out of the box office, right, Mike?

MM:: Exactly.

PS: All you guys that they don't trust, I don't know what you're going to do. But it was pretty cool, but let's tell them -- shall we move into talking about the Sell Our Souls? I don't want to take too much time here.

EM: Yes, please. Sell Our Souls. I'm taking it back now, it belongs to me.

PS: Oh, this is VHS, so it's going to look awful. We never really got to get to 35 with this yet, but we will.
[TRAILER RUNS -- TRAILER ENDS]

EM: That wasn't your voice was it?

PS: No, that wasn't my voice, actually that was the editor, and I gave you the wrong copy, I am sorry about that. But, Elvis, I want to just tell you one thing. The reason I'm wearing black is because of the reviews you've given me. Anyway -- okay. Anyway -- now I'm really screwed, right?

EM: Yes, you think those are bad.

PS: Well, what have I got to lose, you know?

EM: Oh, you'll see.

PS: All right, all right. This man's powerful, what are we going to do. This movie actually almost got a release recently. On June 14th, it was meant to be released in Chicago. What we were going to do -- because someone told me the only way to make a movie happen anymore, these days, because distribution is so difficult, the only way to make it happen is to make it an event. So I got this idea, called up Sharon Osborne, I knew the Oz Fest was going out again this year. I said, let me make this trailer, and then right before Black Sabbath goes on, when there's 50,000 people looking at the screen, you can put the trailer up and then we can say, and it's playing at the -- what's the theater in Chicago?

MM: Century Center.

PS: In Chicago, that's where we're going to open. And then 50,000 target audience fans would be hearing this and would be able to go to the theater. It was a terrific plan, and Mike was working with me to organize that. And we had all the advertising, etc., and at the last minute I found out that she had not cleared the rights, so we had to pull the movie. And it's still in that situation actually, so this movie does not yet have a release because it has rights problems, but Mike and I hired Mike Thomas, who's an independent booking agent, to book theaters all over the country. We had them all lined up, and that's how we were going to send this one out, but it didn't happen.

EM: Which rights?

PS: When we started the movie -- this is boring, I hate to be talking about this, but when we started the movie, I asked the line producer, I said, what's the deal with the music rights? And the line producer said, let me talk to Sharon Osborne, and so Sharon Osborne said it's all taken care of in the Oz Fest contract. So we assumed that the publishing and the master use rights were all taken care of. I think Sharon really didn't know that you had to have two. And I didn't think to ask her, well, have you got them both? So we actually had the master use rights but we didn't have the publishing. And we -- I found out like two years later, after working for free for two years. So please give me a good review next time, Elvis.

EM: Moving right along. I wanted to ask you guys -- I actually met you at a film festival, Penelope, and you guys too, how important are festivals in terms of sort of securing the kind of attention to get your distribution? Obviously, not so in the case of Memento, but in general, what does that do?

BB: Well, everything's being reviewed, written about it, gets audience reactions. I mean, depending on a festival like Toronto, where it seems to be more the people in the city going to the festival. Or Sundance, industry people. So I think there's both audience reaction and critical reaction and just -- I mean, it can backfire. You can see distributors like running down the street, trying to sneak out, before they have to face the producer. So it can go either way, but I think ultimately it does give you exposure. And then later -- on Memento, it was sort of getting critical response, in getting ready to open the film. We just handed out these sort of Polaroid cards with a weird picture of Guy and the website backwards, just early on, like months and months ahead. It really started a great web campaign for it. So that's what we did at Toronto, just hand out cards with backwards Memento on it.

AA: They're selling on E-bay right now, and I really wish I'd kept that box from Sundance. But also, Elvis, your early review of the movie gave us a lot of confidence, too. I mean, that was the big discussion that we had when we thought --

EM: See, see?

AA: I'm sorry. But no, when you're testing the waters that makes a big difference. Not just internally for us, but also for the guys that are spending the money. It gives them a vote of confidence that the people will get behind the film, so I think that helped us tremendously.

EB: Film festivals are also a place where you canvas critics. We're pretty shameless about that. Just seeing what critics like the films. And if a film is picking up a lot of critical momentum, we'll be much more inclined to take a look at it.

EM: I just wonder though in terms of audience. Because you saw Allison's movie at a screening with an audience. Did that sort of give you confidence? Based on the audience reaction at Sundance or what?

GG: Not with that film -- no. Because everybody was just sort of silent. And you're watching a movie that just kind of gets to you inside. So I think that was a personal feeling that probably everybody shared in there. And what you're suggesting, what you're saying, that happens on lots of other movies but not this particular one.

PS: We had a standing ovation at both South By Southwest and Sundance for Sold Our Souls, and not one call from a distributor. So I don't really think -- it's just that things are different now. Maybe five years ago, four years ago, I think that a distributor would sit in there and see the audience reaction and really want to go and where are the Harvey and Bob stories of beating the doors down in the motel rooms, you know? It just doesn't happen anymore.

EM: I guess I wonder too just because there has been so much money thrown around at festivals, we heard in the last few years, for movies that end up not making a lot of money that now people sort of look at a festival buzz as being kind of maybe a negative indicator.
EB: Almost always, the buzz when going into Sundance is never the buzz going out. Every single year.

BB: Yes, there's always like the sort of pre-festival buzz and that's a surprise. But on the other hand, you'll find a film that the audience reaction is great to, and that does give you information. We picked up Manic at Sundance last year, after that, and it was mainly the audience reaction that was interesting. Not necessarily the typical critic, but it was like a reaction of people relating to the film.
 
EB: I have to say, I'm pretty suspicious of festival audiences in general. They're there in a sort of conditioned environment, and it's not like the open marketplace. It's not like they've paid $7.50 on a Saturday night to go see a movie. They're there rooting for the films a lot of times. And sometimes it doesn't go over well. But I always discount festival audiences, I think it's a completely sort of artificial environment that you see films in. I mean, not totally discount it, but I'm always suspicious of it. I always go by my own gut reaction instead. Good and bad, too.

JT: The first time that I did the whole thing, it was really fun and I saw a lot of movies and I met a lot of filmmakers. And then I never get to see a movie anymore. I mean, I'm just basically working the whole time and a bit worried. I find it really stressful. Particularly Sundance actually is particularly stressful. It might be the altitude, I don't know.

EB: It's those damn blue laws.

JT: I did get to see Penelope's Decline III at one Sundance in '97, I guess it would have been.

PS: Probably '98.

JT: '98 and then I missed Sold Our Souls this time and I was really bummed last year that I missed that.

PS: At this rate you'll never get to see it. I'll send you a --

JT: I want to do that.

EM: I guess I wonder because it's got to at some point be sort of the first place you show the movie to an audience, and it sort of sends a signal out to distributors, I guess.

DM: Well, it's also -- it says something about the film if it's been accepted to a very good festival. It sort of at that moment elevates it and people start calling before the festival and you say, no, you can't see it. And then there starts to become sort of an aura about it. And then I think the other idea is that acquisitions executives, I don't know whether it's really true, but the sort of idea is that they go intending to buy some films. And so -- which is good. But it doesn't -- I think there is possibly -- I mean, for us the debate is always do we want to show the film before a festival? I mean, you guys, Jennifer, decided to sell that film, or expose the film without going through a festival.

JT: We had missed our window too. We missed Sundance that year. We finished the film around Christmas time. So that's why we had all the distributors in town for the Oscars. So that was our plan to show it that weekend. And then when it didn't, that's when we hit the festival circuit.

DM: Okay. Was there any thought of maybe let's wait until the next festival or was it --

JT: No. Because I think that we thought it would be better actually to go to Cannes or something with a distributor. We actually thought then -- also sometimes you'd sell your film and then they get to help mount their publicity campaign by doing the festival circuit with you. Because sometimes you get more attention at the festivals when you're coming in as one of those films. We didn't really think we were going to get into a big bidding war at the festival. And we actually thought we had better chances if it was just the right time, but it didn't really work for us.

EM: See, I guess I wondered too because for you guys, you directors, when you're trying to get these pictures into the hands of distributors, what's that first screening like for you? To show it to somebody who may potentially buy it?

AA: Well, I swear I really try to just go and do what I need to do with presenting the movie and making sure that as much -- I spend as much time with the actors as possible, and just really kind of not focus too much on that. Because it really does stress me out so hard. Because I don't really understand business at all. So I'm always very tense. The last couple of times I've gone to Sundance without a distributor. With Sugar Town I was pretty astounded by that whole thing, of selling a movie at Sundance. That was crazy. I just, I was so determined I was finally going to go see A Hard Day's Night, I was like, "no, I'm leaving, I'm going to go -- I can't talk about this anymore." There were several different offers and it's really stressful because offers will be pulled, and it was pretty crazy. But in the end it ended up working out great and we sold the film. It was probably the last kind of great story there in terms of making a sale because we made the film which we owned for $400,000. And we sold it for $1.2 million to October. But the sad thing was that then October was no longer, about two months later. This time -- you know, it's always scary because you want to make back for people and we only owned North American. And then I agree that you don't really know about the audience either at a festival. Especially at Sundance because it is very industry -- it's all people from here really, and from New York. So it's not like Toronto where you're really seeing an audience of people who just come out from the town and like to see movies. So it's a little tricky. I love Sundance but it is very stressful when you go there to sell a movie. To me it's like the Smiths song, "Heaven knows I'm miserable now." He says, "I was looking for a job and then I found a job, and heaven knows I'm miserable now." And it's kind of like getting into a film festival was always that. You want to get in, but then you've got to go. But you can always see films, and that's what's so great. And meet other filmmakers.

PS: I may be unique in that I own this movie. For Decline III, it was really important to play the festivals and it's really important to get at least some sort of limited theatrical release. Because when you do that you're platforming the film so that it is perceived as a theatrical picture as opposed to a video or a DVD. So in my mind, that's really my goal. And now, since I'm going to be releasing the Decline I, II and III on DVD, I don't really care that I didn't get a big theatrical release on the Decline III, but the fact that I had one at all makes it a film instead of just some sort of long-form video or something. And it's really all about that kind of perception with people. They don't want to go buy videos or DVDs, they want to buy that which was a movie. And that's the reason to go to festivals and have a small release, I think.

EM: At what point do you guys have to play a part in the plan to get the film marketed and distributors interested in it? What were your discussions with Allison?

DM: Well, there were a lot of logistics. Getting the actors there, and then there was a lot of work to prepare a press packet. And then at the festival Allison was working very hard, was out there talking to the press a lot, and it was absolutely crucial for her to be an integral part of it. I mean, the festival is not oriented toward the financier, toward the producer, it's all about the director.

EM: Was that the case with you guys too? That you just felt like going to the festival was just getting the movie in front of an audience or --

JT: Well, I think it was the same thing about sort of the critics and buzz and all of that. I think the interesting thing about what you asked about marketing and putting it out there, for me it was that obviously Memento is the only independent film I've ever done and it's a very different process than when you're doing something for a studio. And they were like, hi, here's your ten Austin Powers posters you're going to choose from. You just have this support system at the studio that I was so accustomed to that I had no idea with Memento. It was like between Bob and Aaron Ryder and myself we did everything. We designed everything, every trailer, we sat there and talked -- I would call Bob and haggle over which quotes to put in the newspaper. In part, it was immensely satisfying, but it's a great deal of work. The role of a producer in an independent film is almost completely different. The movie was actually the easiest part for me, which is usually the struggle. And it's all of this stuff that we've been talking about tonight. It becomes a whole 'nother full-time job. Everything from are we going to hand out cards on the street at Sundance to everything. I'm amazed that all of you can get the work done that you do. But it's a very, very different process. And for me that was kind of what was most interesting about going through this.

EM: And would you do it again?

JT: Well, I said when we didn't get a distributor I was never going to do it again. But it would depend on the filmmaker.

EM: Bob, being with -- and having been in basically sort of exhibition versus being in production/distribution, why do you think things have contracted so much? I mean, there seems to be more and more fear, and yet there are more and more movies around than ever before.

BB: I think it's a cycle of distribution companies. And it is, it's a brutal business of the dollars. I mean, IFC -- I'm lucky in that it's got an independent sort of spirit and they like to do these films. But it's owned by a big company and we have great backing and they don't really want to make a big Hollywood action movie. It's not like they're doing this to get into that. They really want to make these films. So I feel really lucky now that I can have some leeway and pick up films, or take a chance on something that's -- like Y Tu Mama Tambien coming out that's going to have ratings problems. It's going to be tricky, but they're willing to go for it. But I think like before we started up it was contracting, there weren't that many distributors in the middle or the smaller. I mean, Eamonn was doing the Shooting Gallery thing, and then there was Miramax and really big wide releases, but not a lot of options in the middle. I think it's just the hard economics of it. It's been very tough.

EM: Is part of it too, and I want to throw this up to everybody, just the perception of knowing where the audience is for a movie? Because Jennifer being in a studio, you know there's always talk about demographics and where you pitch the movie. But having an independent picture, I don't think they're shaped to attack a certain audience segment, are they?

DM: They're shaped to avoid the mass audience. I mean, if you think about it. I mean independent films generally are independent because they are not geared toward the masses. And it's tough subject matter, or it's a niche market. Or it's not a happy ending, no tap dancing, is that the expression? Toe-tapping, thank you. Ultimately, you're starting out with that challenge, that additional challenge, and so people are going to have to think differently about how to market a film. The first film that we got involved with that was a festival kind of film was black and white, Spanish language. It was four different parts and no main actors, I mean, no well-known stars. But it was a great film. It was called La Ciudad, and it was amazing to me, and I'm still amazed, this was sort of my big lesson, was that someone didn't jump in, some distributor didn't jump in and tackle that, because it was just a great film, and didn't find the audience for this unique film. But actually Zeitgeist did, but it wasn't Miramax funding. It wasn't a big company. And yet, hey, if I really step back from it, I think, well maybe black-and-white, Spanish language films are challenging.

BB: I think it's also a partnership with distributors and exhibitors. You need a place to show them. And with Landmark and other exhibitors that still have -- that still rely on kind of their gut instinct or their personal reaction to a film, like in New York also with Lincoln Plaza, with Dan Talbot, who will look at a film and if he likes it, it'll play. It's not like how much are you going to spend the first week and we're not going to do that. If he likes it, he'll give it a shot. And if it works, he'll let it play and find an audience. Which is very rare I find. The same thing with Landmark or Laemmle. You have the pressures of it's got to perform Friday, but it's a lot less than, say, the larger circuits. So it's a great partnership. And I think there are more screens now. Mike just opening in New York. It's been a little better with -- there's more screens this year. There was a big contraction a while ago and it was tough to get the film out. But I think it is an encouraging sign that there are more theaters that are going to try this stuff. And the good thing about Memento, it did also open up some of the larger circuits to try some of these films. Now the next one that comes along wasn't quite Memento and it doesn't work, they might back off, but it helped. I think it helped me selling some of the other, more difficult films, having Memento come right before it.

EM: You know, you were saying independent films maybe aren't meant for mainstream. But something like Memento or maybe The Crying Game or Pulp Fiction sort of creates a lottery where people kind of think, well, there is an audience. And these movies can work in the mainstream. But it actually ends up, and maybe I'm wrong with this, defeating the purpose. Because it makes people think that these things can be marketed in the same way mainstream movies can.

AA: I felt like -- I remember when Pulp Fiction happened the way that it did. I was like, oh, I just had this sinking feeling like, now they'll want all of us to do that, and we're not all going to do that. And it really changed things from that moment on, I think.

EB: The up-side on art films or independent films is greater than ever. Crouching Tiger, you know, a Chinese subtitled film did $127 million last year. And Traffic, even though it has Michael Douglas is still, you know, artistically, stylistically, it's an art film. But what's really the problem now is that -- okay, I'll spend this much money and get it out to a targeted audience and make my money back and go on and make a modest profit and go on and do another film. What you have now is this gap. It's just huge success versus abject failure. And the abject failure is abject. It's unbelievable now. You can spend hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars and get $10,000 back. Not profit, just return. The downside is just perilous right now. That's what's really the real problem. And that was one of the things about the Shooting Gallery film series. We tried as much as possible to protect our downside, which is really what's killing efforts to get substantive works out there.

EM: You said that you actually were seeing an uptake with each series you did with the Shooting Gallery?

EB: It was progressive, yes, more and more people were going. But as far as the economics of trying to get a film out there and get it noticed in a sea of ten to twelve releases per week is daunting. We're in the same city that Hollywood studios are in and they're outspending us 10 to 1 easily, 20 to 1, more. And our boat's floating in those same waters, and you've got to distinguish yourself some way.

EM: But you were talking before about basically finding a way to -- find an audience and lead them to the picture.

EB: I always try to build from certain strengths. You try to come from securing this core, and a lot of people actually make a mistake of trying to hit the homerun in independent films right away. Just go out to the mass audience. If you compete against Hollywood, you're going to lose. They have many more weapons than you do; they're going to spend a lot more money than you are. What you really have to do is secure the core audience all the time, and then you grow from there. If you're working with a core audience, you grow out to concentric circles, just keep building upon successes. It's not easy to do, it's nerve-wracking, it's incredibly labor intensive, but I think it's really the only sort of sane way to go about and do it.

|